Skip to content
SaigonFiftyTonight's pick

the whole thing, free

Open dataset

Every winner with both platforms' scores, our Bayesian-adjusted comparison, the divergence index and the closed flag from the latest live check. CC BY 4.0 — use it, cite it, build on it.

Download CSVDownload JSON

Updated · Re-ranked on the 1st of every month · next run 1 September 2026.

What is in each row

FieldMeaning
rankTripAdvisor award rank, 1–50 as published
name / slugRestaurant name and our URL slug
ward / areaGoogle's post-2025 ward string, and our six-area grouping
addrFull street address as Google returns it
g / gcGoogle rating and review count
t / tcTripAdvisor rating and review count
gb / tbBayesian-adjusted Google and TripAdvisor scores
scoreCombined adjusted score — what our consensus ordering uses
dcDivergence index: adjusted gap, centred on the median of all 50
consensusAgreement percentage, 100 minus the adjusted gap in points
verdictOur editorial stamp, derived only from the numbers
closedtrue if Google listed it temporarily closed at the snapshot
price / price_bandSpend band in ₫, and TripAdvisor's own $ band
family / tagsOur cuisine family, and TripAdvisor's raw cuisine tags

Both platforms' scores go through the same Bayesian adjustment — a prior of 4.45 with weight 150 — so a 5.0 from 95 reviewers cannot outrank a 4.8 from 3,900. The divergence index is the gap between the two adjusted scores, centred on the median across all fifty. Positive means Google's larger, more local sample likes it more than TripAdvisor's traveller sample does. Negative means the reverse.

Using the dataset

Can I republish this data?

Yes, under CC BY 4.0: credit RestaurantsSaigon.com and link back. The underlying Google and TripAdvisor ratings remain theirs and are included for factual comparison; the adjusted scores, divergence index and verdicts are our analysis.

How often is the file regenerated?

On the first of every month, together with the ranking. Each file carries its snapshot month in the meta block, so you can tell two downloads apart.

What is the Bayesian prior you use?

Both platforms' scores go through the same Bayesian adjustment — a prior of 4.45 with weight 150 — so a 5.0 from 95 reviewers cannot outrank a 4.8 from 3,900.